egnouf
About
- Username
- egnouf
- Joined
- Visits
- 187
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
Dear all, I am writing you as I am not going to maintain anymore the LXR-OWL firmware. I have too much work on my other musical projects (M4L plugins -- http://smaolab.org). I am really sorry about that. Enjoy and take care.
-
Oki perfect ! I will check the misalignement and keep you inform :-)
-
Hello Brende(andclarke ;-)) I have downloaded your GITHUB souce code about 037 dev version where you load individuel tracks :-) I am very interested in integrating this LOAD/SAVE feature to my LWR-OWL program. I did merge your code to mine... and …
-
@re5etuk: Check the website -> http://smaolab.github.io/ you have all the links to the documentation, the differneces betwen the official release and my version, etc. :-) You can also search on the forum : keyword "unofficial firmware". cheers.
-
Oh youah very nice , I recognize the sound color of the electobre ;-) I have one ;-) nice work ! really happyness ! thanks man ! can you put on the forum your LXR patches ? would be lovely !!!! thanks!
-
Hello Mongrol :-) In fact, some of the FXs are coming from the OWL patches (the project PEDAL platform as you mentionned ! well guess !), but not all :-) I get also inspired by the DSP.org website and some books, etc. I took certain effects from t…
-
I have published the LXR-OWL firmware to 0.37. the LXR-OWL firmware is now up to date, at the same level as Julian Version :-) Download it here: http://smaolab.github.io/
-
Hello everyone, I wrote a tutorial about the LXr programming on the WIki of the LXR sonic potion website. I know that the tutorial is not well written (it's a mess ;-) ) but I think you could start by having a look at it ;-) regards.
-
Hello! nice work :-) I would like to see if I could learn from your code to include some nce features to my firmware (OWL, etc) :-) Would you mind telling me where is the code ? I guess on github but where exactly? Cheers!
-
perfect :-)
-
Nice article and explanations julian! Its really cool to read your progress, your objectifs, etc :-) I appreciate.
-
Yeap, it's true that the FXs are quite drastic. Try to mute the Track 1 (the BD) and play with the FX, tell me if it still "noizy" or not. I am asking you this as I noticed that if I mute the BD (track1) and play with my FXs, then you get nice noi…
-
Hello Jhsynth, can you be more explicit ? Click twice on "PERF", you should get the FXs .... no?
-
I am not going to work on a M4L device for the LXR :-( I have to admit that I want to add some more flexible looping function to my code and work on some specials M4L patches :-) for some artists I am working with. extra notes: I did not forget to…
-
Ah , I see now. In fact, it is a matter of send the right CC parameters, the difficult part is the design, I think it's long and painful work (but not complex). well, it's my opinion and i can be wrong :-) Did you check the VST plug in made by Juli…
-
Thkx guys! About M4L , I think the plug ins I propose are nice , no ;-) What is in your mind about making a M4L patch dedicated to the LXR ? if you could open a thread, we could discuss all toghether about features. Regards.
-
yeap, OWL is nice. note that I think you get agressive noize especially if you don't mute the BD/kick. I am now using another machine for the kick. Like this the FXs are much more musical... give it a try and tell me :-)
-
Dear windspirit, In fact, I made a design choice. Let me try to explain (sorry for my english): - I could not really in live make a nice looping effect as you had to turn 2 knobs to change the looping points, and if possible in sync with the whole …
-
Dear acidhouseforall, Consider OWL as an evolution of Marimba and fusion. Fusion was my first release, then I updated the fusion with new functions.. I called it Marimba. Now I rewrote many part of marimba code and rearranged the FX sections to kee…
-
Dear Zoobo ;-) - I think that the offical firmware from Julian, Version 0.34 is fine. I did not hear any new bug since a long time. You are not the first guy to mention that the LXR versionning could cause some missunderstanding on its development …
-
I will check, but I think that I and someone else noticed the same "issue" as you. We found it nice giveing improvisation option .. but witjh the experience and the time, I think I should correct this behaviour... I will publish a new LXR - OWL vers…
-
Thanks a lot for the nice words! @jbdiver - My code is stil experimental and not very well C written. I am improving the code day after day but I think that for the moment, and, if not requested by the community at large, it's not usefull to merge …
-
ah good point!! byt the way, I am uploading the new LXR code (LXR-OWL).. it works, but I need to improve the code, the credits.txt, etc... but you can take the firmware and play with FX 1 to 8 . Firmware: https://github.com/rstephane/LXR-OWL/blob…
-
Hello, I don't understand what I should do, Do you want me to rebuild the firmware.bin and push it on github? Note that I will release this week a new firmware LXR-OWL that will contain only 5 effects (simple compressor, decimate & bit crusher,…
-
I will publish soon a new version of Marimba called LXR-OWL inspired by their plug ins and also my own plug ins ;-) I put a sound to show the new fx on http://www.soundcloud.com/djsmao/ look for the 8bit project :-) regards
-
I have looked more into details to this project and especially to the code of certain of their plug in. I adapted the simple compressor they made, as well as a "bitcrusher". thanks to this migration, I improved my comprehension about the LXR code an…
-
Hello, you could turn the sonic LXR machine into a FX box, but then how do you insert the input lines? so you could create your own synth (for sure) plus adding FX... but not realtime treatment from an external audio source :-(
-
I found the issue, I added at the top of my program: #include /* memset */ #include /* close */ issue solved.
-
Reverb algorithms: I have an "issue when compiling": warning: implicit declaration of function 'memset' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] memset(reverb_buffer, 0, sizeof(reverb_buffer)); ^ ./src/DSPAudio/distortion.c:303:11:…
-
Oki, I see :-) So If I understand, you choose the values by "random" - by yourself - you did not took those values from another program or theory ? Next, I am wondering if changing the global tempo over the steps would be significant. I explain: - …